Other Articles

The Isolation of Creative Competence
In Organizations Is Getting Worse

By Gary Chicoine

 

In a world of untrustworthy government and rampant big corporate corruption, the deterioration of realms of honest business and management competence is increasing.  So, the first rule of survival of any creative and competent manager or officer in any organization or institution is this:  Do not let other people in your organizational circumstance tell you who you are.  There is no need to mindlessly drift into disaster through thoughtless conformity to bad thinking patterns and wrong decision trends all around you.  If you have genuine creative intelligence and vigorous active competence, then it is you and those like you that are keeping your organization and your world in one piece.

Look around you.  How many people do you find who are unable to improve their own consciousness, but who believe they can improve the consciousness of others and even of the whole nation or the world? The organization abounds in left-brain cynical critics.  Who does not secretly wish there were something better somewhere to go to?  The contemporary organization has become a virtual insane asylum where the patients imagine they are doctors.

There is less and less budget everywhere for improvement. In the few places where there is budget for it, the views and choices on the subject are unbelievably shallow and useless.  This is because the usual state of the brain/intellect lacks awareness.  Any depth of understanding would seem to be too time-consuming and impractical, which is just a cover-up of actual shared incompetence.  When people are unable to learn, they decree learning to be unnecessary and wasteful.  Hence, the decision to buy in to false learning.

Real possible improvements cost less to the organization than the false programs, but they are more easily rejected because they do not appeal to the wrong element in managerial brains, which is a faith in old patterns of respectability in the field of improvement.  Anything new and better is treated with organized blindness.  Thus, if it is new, it is "untested", and if it is better, that cannot be "understood".  Because the better is better, it must by definition be immediately incomprehensible, for comprehension would only come with learning, which leads to improvement.

There are many small, relatively unknown consultancies that can do wonderful things for organization improvement.  The reason they remain small is that any of them that become big automatically become stupid, left-brained and incompetent.  The larger the consultancy, the greater its reputation throughout the world, the more it will automatically be a rip-off.  Volumes could be written about this; some good volumes have been written about this.  But organizations do not learn from all this for the same reason they do not learn from anything whatsoever, and that reason is that the majority of power-possessing people in and around the organization are incapable of genuine learning, as are the majority of middle managers.  Non-learning in the individuals cannot combine as any form of collective learning initiative.  Any sort of supposed collective learning initiative will just be hype by definition.  The more popular a program is, the less it is worth.  Mediocrity is not high-valued.  Unhappy non-learners really are the majority.

 

Gary Chicoine

February 2004

©2004 Gary Chicoine